Case Results

icon

20+

years of experience

icon

100+

5-star reviews

icon

100%

criminal defense

D., Charged with DWI (Oct. 2024)

Pretrial Motion Result: Case Dismissed.

Mr. Hiltzheimer’s client was charged with Driving While Impaired, Reckless Driving, and Misdemeanor Speeding after being stopped for driving 30 miles over the speed limit. After a thorough review of the case, our attorneys determined that our client’s constitutional rights had been violated after the point of his arrest, when he was denied access to a witness after submitting to the breathalyzer. Following a hearing in which our attorney argued that the client’s rights were violated pursuant to State v. Knoll, all charges were dismissed by the court.

M., Charged with DWI (Aug. 2024)

Pretrial Motion Result: Case Dismissed.

Mr. DiDomenico’s client was charged with Driving While Impaired, Driving While License Revoked Impaired Revocation, and a License Plate Frame Violation. Client was facing an Aggravated Level 1 DWI judgment which would carry a minimum term of imprisonment of 120 days. Mr. DiDomenico successfully argued that the officer lacked reasonable suspicion to stop because even though the officer was unable to read the temporary plate, the frame itself was not in violation of the statute and there was no intent to cover or disguise the contents. All charges were dismissed by the court.

E., Charged with DWI (July 2024)

District Court Trial Result: Not Guilty

Mr. DiDomenico represented a client who was in a car wreck and was subsequently charged with Driving While Impaired, No Operator’s License, and Failure to Maintain Lane Control. Mr. DiDomenico took the case to trial and argued that under State v. Trexler that even though the defendant openly admitted to driving the vehicle, the admission alone (absent sufficient corroborating evidence by the state) was insufficient to find his client guilty. Client was found not guilty on all counts. 

J., Charged with DWI (Jan. 2024)

District Court Trial Result: Not Guilty.

In this case Mr. Hiltzheimer’s client fell asleep behind the wheel while waiting at a stop light behind another accident that had already occurred, and while unconscious, rear-ended another vehicle. Because police were already on scene, the collision was recorded on an officer’s dashcam. The client was arrested and blew a 0.17 on the Intox breathalyzer. The client was found Not Guilty at a district court trial because the State failed to produce a witness who personally observed our client behind the wheel of the vehicle, and the court found the evidence to be insufficient to support a conviction.

a., charged with dWI (march 2021):

pretrial motion result: case dismissed.

In this case our client was charged with DWI following a single-car traffic accident in which the client’s car veered off the road and collided with a tree. After the client’s arrest, client was detained for an extended period of time and the defense was able to establish violations of the client’s rights under North Carolina law and the US Constitution. The Court dismissed the charge as a result of those violations.

r., charged with DWI (august 2020):

trial outcome: not guilty all counts.

In this case Mr. Hiltzheimer’s client was charged with Driving While Impaired and Failure to Maintain Lane Control following a motorcycle accident. The client was found in a ditch under the bike with serious injuries, and blood analysis revealed a BAC of .14. Following a technical challenge to the state’s evidence regarding the timing of the accident, which was never established, the court found that the BAC was not proven to be within a “relevant time after the driving,” as required by North Carolina law. As a result, the Court found the firm’s client NOT GUILTY of both counts.

meeting room

Contact Us Today

Get your free consultation.

phone icon

Call or Text: (919) 899-9404